진학프로석·박사 채용 접수 플랫폼

Universidade do Porto

PUBLIC NOTICE n.º 1194/2025

Doctor José Manuel Pereira Dias de Castro Lopes, Full Professor of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Vice-Rector of this University:

Following my Order issued on May 20, 2025, by delegated power under Ordinance no. 9493/2022 published in the Official Gazette (Diário da República), 2nd series, no. 148 of 02 August, and for a period of 30 working days from the working day immediately following publication of this notice in the Diário da República a call for applications is published for one position of an Assistant Professor in the disciplinary area of Informatics Engineering at the Department of Informatics Engineering (DEI) of the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto.

1. Legal dispositions

Articles 37º to 51º and 62º-A, of the ECDU “Estatuto da Carreira Docente Universitária”, republished by the Decree-Law no. 205/2009, of August 31 and modified by the Law no. 8/2010, of May 13, and “Regulation on Competition for the Recruitment of Full, Associate and Assistant Professors of the University of Porto” – Decision no. 12913/2010, published in “Diário da República”, no. 154, of August 10, and the Deliberation no. 380/2019 published in “Diário da República”, no. 64, of April 1.

2. Funding

This call is open under the FCT-Tenure Program – 1st Edition, published through the Call for Applications Notice (AAC) with reference Investment C06-i06 – Science and Capacity Building, PRR Notice No. 02/C06-i06/2024 (application reference 2023.11089.TENURE.053).

3. Characterisation of the Job

3.1. Scientific Area(s): Computing Systems and Architectures (ASC).

3.2. Disciplinary Area(s): Informatics Engineering

3.3. Category: Assistant Professor

3.4. Number of Positions: 1

3.5. Remuneration: Scale 1, index 195 of the category of Assistant Professor

3.6. Job Description:

The Assistant Professor will be responsible for carrying out the duties set out in Article 4 and Article 5(3) of of the ECDU, namely, and under the terms of the application best identified in point 2 of this notice:

Carry out research, teaching and university extension activities in the disciplinary area to which the competition relates and in particular in the scientific sub-area of Computing Systems and Architectures (ASC) of the DEI*, especially on topics related to Cloud Computing and/or Trusted Computing.

Carrying out research activities, namely in methodologies, middleware, tools and techniques in the context of cloud computing, with a preference for trusted computing, integrated in the INESC TEC Research Unit - Institute for Systems and Computer Engineering, Technology and Science.

4. Administrative admission requirements to the competition

According to Article 41º-A of the ECDU, only those who hold the degree of Doctor may be admitted to this competition.

Holders of academic degrees awarded by foreign higher education institutions must hold a recognised doctoral degree under the terms of Decree-Law no. 66/2018, of 16 August, in its current wording, by the date of expiry of the deadline for the signing of the contract.

5. Approval on absolute merit

5.1. If there are no fundaments for rejecting the applications, the Jury will deliberate on their approval or non-approval on absolute merit, by justified nominal vote, abstentions not being accepted.

5.2. The candidate is approved on absolute merit if he/she is approved by an absolute majority of the voting jury members.

5.3 - Candidates will be approved on absolute merit if they have an overall curriculum that the jury considers to be of scientific and pedagogical merit, capacity for research and activity, compatible with the subject area for which the competition was opened and appropriate to the respective teaching category, as documented in the respective information submitted to the competition.

The merit approval of a candidate will depend on the cumulative fulfillment of the following requirements:

a) holding a Ph.D. degree in the area of Informatics Engineering or another scientific area deemed appropriate, considering the scientific subareas* of the Department of Informatics Engineering (DEI) of the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto (FEUP), and especially in topics related to cloud computing and/or trusted computing.

b) having conducted high-quality, significant, research activities in the Computing Systems and Architectures (ASC, “Arquitectura e Sistemas Computacionais”) scientific subarea* of DEI, with preference in topics related to cloud computing and/or trusted computing, during the 5 years’ period immediately before the date of this public notice.

c) having a selected set of high-quality scientific publications (as required in 6.3.1), preferably as the first author, providing evidence of the candidate’s capability to publish in journals/conferences of reference (e.g., IEEE/ACM Transactions, Elsevier/Springer SCImago SJR Q1, CORE Ranking A*/A conferences) in topics related to cloud computing and/or trusted computing.

The 5 (five) year period referred to in point c) may be extended by the jury, at the request of the candidate, when based on suspension of scientific activity for socially protected reasons, exclusively for reasons of parental leave. The extension will be one year per birth during the 5 (five) year period, and the candidate must provide a birth certificate of each child or other official document establishing their link to the child.

(*Scientific subareas of DEI: https://sigarra.up.pt/feup/pt/UNI_GERAL.UNIDADE_VIEW?pv_unidade=151).

6. Evaluation and ranking on relative merit

Once the successful candidates have been definitively identified on absolute merit, they will be ranked on relative merit, based on the aspects and criteria for ranking, their respective weighting and final evaluation system, established in accordance with the provisions of article 50(6) of the ECDU and article 16 of the Regulation.

6.1 Assessment methodology

Candidates approved on absolute merit will be subject to a curriculum evaluation, which may be complemented by a public presentation hearing, to which candidates approved on absolute merit will be submitted, aimed at clarifying aspects related to the curriculum and the scientific-pedagogical programme, bearing in mind the general duties assigned to university lecturers by article 4 of the ECDU, focusing on the aspects and respective criteria identified below.

6.2. Assessment aspects

The assessment of candidates will focus on the following aspects and Programme, with emphasis on curricular aspects in the disciplinary area for which the competition was opened, with a special focus on the scientific sub-area of Computing Systems and Architectures (ASC) of the DEI*, especially on the topics related to Cloud Computing and/or Trusted Computing:

1. Scientific Merit (VMC) – 65%;
2. Pedagogical experience and merit (VEMP) – 12%;
3. Extension, economic, and social valorization of knowledge tasks (VTC) - 8%
4. Scientific and Pedagogical Program - (PCP) – 15%

6.3. Assessment criteria

The criteria to be taken into consideration when assessing each of the assessment and Project aspects identified in the previous point and the weighting to be given to each of them in the final classification are as follows:

6.3.1. Criteria for evaluation of Scientific Merit (VMC) – 65%

CMC1 - Scientific Production

Quality of scientific production in the areas for which the competition is open (books, articles in journals, publications in conference proceedings, etc.) expressed by the type of publications, and by the recognition given to them by the scientific community (reflected in the quality of the scientific journals of publications, the places of publication and presentation and the references made to them by other authors), in relation to the following sets of articles:

Set of up to 5 (five) scientific articles published in the last 5 (five) years, which the candidates consider to be most representative of their research activity.

A set of up to 5 (five) scientific articles that the candidates consider to be the most representative of the research activity they have carried out up to the date of submission of the competition documents.

To these sets of articles, candidates must add a summarised justification about the international scientific importance and a description of the candidate's contributions to each of these articles.

Preference will be given to the publication of scientific articles in A* or A conferences (CORE rankings) and in international journals considered to be of reference by the international scientific community in the scientific sub-area of Computing Systems and Architectures of the DEI*. Preference will also be given to publication in journals and conferences with ACM (Association for Computing Machinery) or IEEE Transactions. Clear preference will be given to publications in relevant journals and conferences and with a contribution to the development of the disciplinary area to which the competition relates, and at in particular in the scientific sub-area of Computing Systems and Architectures (ASC) of the DEI*, especially in topics related to Cloud Computing and/or Trusted Computing.

Applications must include:

A description of the strategy and practices followed in terms of publications and the choice of conferences/

workshops/journals;

Clear identification of works published first at conferences/workshops and then in journals, resulting from extensions of articles;

Identification of the practices followed by the community regarding the order of authors in scientific publications;

Identification in each publication of the respective CORE rankings (conferences) or the respective quartile in SCImago (SJR) (journals), if they exist.

CMC2 - Coordination and participation in scientific projects

The quality of a set of up to 5 (five) scientific projects financed on a competitive basis by public funds, through national or international agencies, or by companies that the candidates consider to be the most representative. Candidates should describe the national/ international relevance of each project, the funding organisation and the overall budget (and local budget if they do not coincide), the main contributions made by the candidate during the preparation of the proposal and during the execution of the project, the roles played by the candidate in each project and the main tasks they carried out, indicating the role played and the results obtained in them, with emphasis on project coordination.

When assessing quality, account should be taken of whether the projects are international, bilateral or national, their size and the funding obtained, the level of demand of the competition, the evaluations of the projects carried out and the prototypes realised, in particular whether they have resulted in products or services.

CMC3 – Intervention in the scientific and professional communities:

Ability to intervene in the scientific and professional communities, expressed in particular by collaborating in the publication of leading scientific journals, by taking part in organisation and technical and scientific committees of leading international conferences, by presenting guest lectures, by taking part in academic juries outside their own institution and by winning prizes and awards.

6.3.2 Criteria for evaluating Experience and Pedagogical Merit (VEMP) - 12%

CEMP1 - pedagogical projects

Promotion of new pedagogical projects (e.g., development of new curricular unit programmes, creation and coordination of new courses or study programmes, etc.) or reform and improvement of existing Projects (e.g., reformulating existing curricular unit programmes, participating in the reorganisation or existing study programmes), as well as carrying out projects with an impact on the teaching/learning process. Evidence of a link between teaching and research activity, namely the involvement of undergraduate students in research activities and the integration of master's students in research projects.

When assessing quality, special emphasis should be placed on the quality, relevance and contributions related to a set of up to 5 (five) teaching projects that candidates consider to be the most representative, describing their main contributions and tasks carried out.

CEMP2 - Production of pedagogical material

Quality and quantity of teaching material produced by the candidate, namely in the form of books, as well as publications of a teaching nature in prestigious international journals or conferences.

When assessing quality, special emphasis should be placed on the quality, relevance and contributions related to a set of up to 5 (five) teaching contributions that the candidates consider to be the most representative, and they should describe their main contributions and tasks carried out.

CEMP3 - Teaching activity

Experience, scope and quality of the teaching activity carried out by the candidate. Whenever possible, the assessment of the quality of the teaching activity carried out by the candidate should make use of the results of objective methods based on opinion surveys (pedagogical surveys) and peer evaluation.

In assessing quality, special emphasis should be given to the quality, relevance and related contributions in a set of up to 5 (five) curricular units taught that candidates consider to be the most representative, describing the main contributions and tasks carried out by the candidate, and including an analysis of the results obtained and the pedagogical surveys.

6.3.3 Criteria for evaluation of the University Outreach and Economic and Social Valorization of Knowledge (VTC) - 8%

Quality of a set of up to 5 (five) projects/works/activities for the economic and social valorisation of knowledge that the candidates consider most relevant, with the candidates describing the national/international relevance and their main contributions. The evaluation should consider the framework they may have in the scientific scientific sub-area of Computing Systems and Architectures (ASC) of the DEI*, especially on the topics related to Cloud Computing and/or Trusted Computing:.

CTC1 - Patents, registration and ownership of rights, drafting of technical standards and legislation:

Authorship and co-authorship of patents, registration of ownership of intellectual property rights on methodologies, software, algorithms, computational methods and mathematical methods.

Participation in drafting legislation and technical standards.

CTC2 - Consultancy services and study and development contracts:

Coordination and participation in consultancy activities and/or study and development activities involving the business environment and the public sector, with candidates emphasising the scientific and technological aspects involved in these activities.

Participation as an expert in panels and evaluation processes for research and development projects in companies and/or organisations in the scientific and technological system. Coordination and participation as a teacher in vocational training or specialisation courses aimed at companies or the public sector.

The evaluation of this criterion should also consider the economic value of the research results achieved, as measured by the development and technology transfer contracts to which they gave rise and the spinoff companies to whose creation they contributed.

CTC3 - Dissemination of science and technology:

Coordination of and participation in scientific and technological dissemination initiatives for the scientific community (e.g. organisation of conferences) and for various audiences.

Scientific and technological dissemination publications.

6.3.4 Criteria for evaluation of the Scientific and Pedagogical Project (VPCP) - 15%

Scientific/pedagogical and outreach programme, which should describe the research, teaching and university outreach activities that the candidate proposes to develop over a period of 5 (five) years, in the disciplinary area to which the competition relates and in particular in the scientific sub-area of Computing Systems and Architectures (ASC) of the DEI*, especially on the topics related to Cloud Computing and/or Trusted Computing, and the respective means for implementing it.

The program will be evaluated according to its consistency, feasibility, impact, and alignment to this call, in each of the following dimensions.

CPD1 - Program for the development of scientific activity;

CPD2 - Program for the development of pedagogical activity;

CPD3 - – Program for the development of the university outreach activity.

7. Working methodology of the Jury

7.1. Scoring the candidates

Each member of the jury will carry out an evaluation exercise, scoring each candidate for each assessment aspect on a scale of 0 to 100 points, rounded up to the nearest tenth, considering the criteria approved for each assessment aspect and program, with a degree of demand appropriate to the category for which the competition is open.

7.2. Public hearing

The Jury can hold a public hearing, under equal circumstances, for all candidates who have passed the competition on absolute merit to personally clarify the evaluation elements contained in the documentation they have submitted.

If it is necessary to hold these public hearings, they will take place between the 30th and 70th day following the deadline for submitting applications, and all candidates will be informed by email at least ten working days in advance of the date and place where these public hearings will take place.

7.3. Final result

The Final Result (RF) of the assessment of each candidate by each member of the jury is calculated using the formula for weighting the various curricular aspects:

RF= (0.65*VMC) + (0.12*VEMP) + (0.08*VTC) + (0.15*VPCP)

which reflects the weights associated with each aspect.

Following the reasoned individual assessment, each member of the jury draws up their ranked list of candidates, with which they participate in the votes that lead to the decision and the final ranking of the candidates under the terms of point 6, and it is not possible for there to be a tie between candidates in the final ranking.

7.4 Deliberations of the Jury

7.4.1. Any deliberations will be the result of Article 17º, no. 12, of the Regulations for Competitions for the Recruitment of Full, Associate and Assistant Professors of the University of Porto, applicable under Article 83º-A of the ECDU, which determined the approval of the same to implement the rules of that legal diploma, covering the procedural process of the competitions, namely the system of evaluation and final classification. Therefore, under the terms of Article 17º, no. 12 of the aforementioned Regulation, the Jury will decide by roll call vote based on the selection criteria adopted and publicized for the approval and ranking of candidates, with an absolute majority required for any decision, and abstentions are not permitted.

7.4.2.Ranking methodology

In the various votes, each member of the Jury must respect their ranking list, observing the following in the votes:

1. the first vote is intended to determine the candidate in 1st place, counting the number of votes each candidate received for that position;
2. if a candidate obtains an absolute majority of the votes for 1st place, they are placed in that position and removed from the ballot, and the procedure for choosing the candidate who will take 2nd place begins;
3. if no candidate obtains an absolute majority of the votes for 1st place, a new ballot begins, only among the candidates who obtained votes for 1st place, after the candidate who received the least votes for that place in the previous ballot has been removed;
4. in the event of a tie between two or more candidates for the position of least voted, a tie-breaking vote is held between them only, counting the number of relative first positions for each, and the least voted candidate is removed;
5. if there is still a tie between two or more candidates in the least voted position, but the number of tied candidates in the least voted position has been reduced compared to the previous round of voting, a new tie-breaking vote is held between the tied candidates in the least voted position only, counting the number of relative first positions of each, and the least voted is removed;
6. in the event of a tie between two or more candidates in the least-voted position, without the number of candidates tied for the least-voted position having been reduced compared to the previous round of voting, the tie-breaker is made by the Chairman's casting vote or by exercising the casting vote, as the case may be, and the candidate voted for by the Chairman is chosen to take part in the subsequent vote for the same position;
7. in the event of a tie when there are only two or more candidates left for 1st place, the tie-breaker is the Chairman's casting vote or the casting vote, as the case may be;
8. if the candidate for 1st place is chosen, he or she is removed from the ballot, and the procedure for selecting the candidate for 2nd place begins, and the process referred to in the previous paragraphs is repeated for the subsequent places until a single ordered list of all the candidates is obtained.

8. Submission of applications

8.1. Submission of applications

Applications must be submitted exclusively on the FEUP’s website, at the following address: https://sigarra.up.pt/feup/pt/CNT_CAND_GERAL.CONCURSOS_LIST, by the deadline.

8.2. Application instructions:

Applications must be accompanied by the following documents, under penalty of exclusion:

1. Application form (personal details and declarations), fully completed, dated and signed, in accordance with the compulsory form available at https://sigarra.up.pt/up/pt/conteudos_geral.ver?pct_pag_id=1004282&pct_parametros=p_pagina=1004282&pct_grupo=3123&pct_grupo=2013&pct_grupo=2015&pct_grupo=2461#2461;
2. PhD certificate, except for cases corresponding to obtaining a PhD from the University of Porto. Applicants who are selected for the post(s) to be filled and hold a doctoral degree obtained abroad must present the recognition or registration (as applicable) of their degree at the time of signing the contract, under the terms of Decree-Law no. 66/2018, of 16 August, under penalty of exclusion;
3. c) Curriculum Vitae containing all the relevant information for assessing the application, as well as for demonstrating compliance with the criteria set out in point 5 of this notice, considering the assessment and ranking criteria set out in point 6.3 of this notice for the assessment strands and parameters. The candidate must structure the Curriculum Vitae in such a way as to facilitate the rapid and complete identification of their contributions, and attach the sections that clearly identify the sets of contributions/activities/projects requested in point 6.3 of this notice;
4. Work mentioned in the curriculum vitae submitted to prove the requirements of point 5 and to assess the criteria set out in point 6 of this notice;

e) File with the scientific/pedagogical and outreach programme. The document must not exceed 10 A4 pages (Times or Times New Roman font, minimum 10-point font), with the exception of the references section, and will be assessed in the PCP section.

8.3. Each document listed in d) of point 8.2 of this notice must be submitted in an individual file and in full in the Sigarra system. The documents can be integrated into folders with a compressed format (zip, rar, 7z). However, it is necessary to consider the system's limit for uploading, which is set at a maximum of 720 MB per file or compressed folder. Each application can submit several compressed files or folders, each with a limit of 720 MB, and the total number of compressed files/folders submitted is not limited.

8.4. To access applications, any documents that can be accessed via links will not be considered, except those that refer to publications with a DOI.

8.5. The documents mentioned in point 8.2. must preferably be submitted in a non-editable format.

8.6. Failure to comply with point 8.1. will result in the application being rejected.

8.7. Failure to submit or submit after the deadline of the documents referred to in points a) to e) of paragraph 8.2. will result in the application not being accepted.

9. Notification and hearing of interested parties

9.1. The Human Resources Department of the University of Porto's Common Resources and Services Centre will notify candidates of the order admitting or not admitting them to the competition, which will be based on compliance or non-compliance with the requirements laid down in the legislation in force and in no. 4 of this notice, and with the conditions established regarding the application form referred to in no. 8.2.

9.2. Candidates who have not been admitted administratively, those who have not been approved on absolute merit, and candidates ranked in a position on the list of candidates who cannot be filled for the post in the competition will be given a hearing under the terms of Articles 121º and 122º of the Code of Administrative Procedure. All candidates will be notified of the Jury’s final decision.

9.3. Notifications are made by email, in accordance with Articles 112.º, no. 1, al. c) and 113.º, no. 5 and no. 6 of the CPA.

Candidates have ten working days to submit their written comments.

10. Composition of the Jury

Chairman:

Doctor Rui Artur Bártolo Calçada, Director and Full Professor of the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto, in the use of delegated competence by order no. 4953/2025, published in the Diário da República, 2nd series, no. 80 of April 24.

Members:

Doctor Alysson Neves Bessani, Full Professor at the Faculty of Sciences of the University of Lisbon;

Doctor Carla Maria Gonçalves Ferreira, Full Professor at the Faculty of Sciences and Technology of the Nova University of Lisbon;

Doctor Miguel Nuno Dias Alves Pupo Correia, Full Professor of the Instituto Superior Técnico of the University of Lisbon;

Doctor João Carlos Pascoal Faria, Full Professor of the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto;

Doctor Carlos Miguel Ferraz Baquero-Moreno, Full Professor of the Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto.

11. Other provisions

Joint Order no. 373/2000 of 31 March, issued by the Minister for State Reform and Public Administration and the Minister for Equality, stipulates that the following must be mentioned in entry and access competitions:

"In fulfillment of point 9 of Article 9 of the Constitution, the Public Administration, as an employer, actively promotes a policy of equal opportunities for men and women in access to employment and professional advancement, taking scrupulous care to avoid any form of discrimination."

In this sense, the terms "candidate(s)", "teacher(s)" and the like are not used in this notice to refer to people's gender.

Likewise, no candidate may be favored, benefited, disadvantaged, or deprived of any right or exempted from any duty on the grounds of ancestry, age, sexual orientation, marital status, family situation, economic situation, education, social origin or condition, genetic heritage, reduced working capacity, disability, chronic illness, nationality, ethnic origin or race, the territory of origin, language, religion, political or ideological convictions, and trade union membership.

The Vice-Rector, ProfessorJosé Manuel Pereira Dias de Castro Lopes, 20 of May of 2025.